Category Archives: News

Middlesbrough: Father Peter Keeling RIP

12 December 2024

Fr Peter Keeling

Tributes have been paid to Father Peter Keeling, who served in parishes throughout the diocese and was the last parish priest of the “Old” St Mary’s Cathedral in Sussex Street, Middlesbrough.

Bishop Terry Drainey was principal celebrant at Father Peter’s Requiem Mass at a packed St Francis of Assisi Church, before burial in Acklam Cemetery.

Born on the town’s Grove Hill estate on March 18 1938, Father Peter served on the altar at St Joseph’s, where the curate, Father Anthony Storey, inspired him to become a priest.

He studied at Ushaw College in Durham and was ordained on June 8 1963 at St Thomas More’s Church, Middlesbrough.

From 1963, he served as curate at St Hilda’s, Whitby, until 1968 when he moved to St John’s Parish, Beverley. In 1972 he was appointed chaplain at Hull University, following his mentor Father Anthony.

During his eight years there Father Peter further progressed his correlation between the Gospel and politics and with Catholic Social Teaching.

At a Seeds of Liberation conference he met American Jesuit and peace activist Father Daniel Berrigan, who told him about Dorothy Day, founder of the Catholic Worker Movement. Benefitting from the university holiday, Father Peter spent it working with Dorothy at her House of Hospitality for the homeless in New York.

On the same trip he also did Poustinia at Madonna House, Combermere, Canada.

In 1980 he moved to St Joseph and St Francis Xavier Church in Richmond and from 1983 he spent a year as a “worker priest”, being warden of an ex-prisoners’ hostel in Hull where he organised a project for the distribution of furniture to needy families. He also celebrated Mass for the sisters of Rise Hall convent.

In 1984, he became parish administrator to the Old Cathedral. It was during his time there, on Ash Wednesday 1987, that he marked a Ministry of Defence building in London with a cross of blessed ashes during the annual Pax Christi anti-nuclear protest.

Father Peter was convicted of criminal damage and fined. When he refused to pay he was sent to Durham Jail for five days. He believed that his action was not criminal but that the crime, or sin, belonged with the MoD. His actions received the full support of his bishop, Augustine Harris.

Father Peter was parish priest of St Joseph’s Church, Pickering, from 1993 to 1997 when he moved to St Francis, Middlesbrough, until he retired in 2013.

During his retirement, he supplied in parishes in and around Middlesbrough, and especially at St Mary’s Cathedral, St Clare’s and St Francis. He was a past chair of the diocesan Justice and Peace Commission and remained a member.

Father Peter always had an open house in his presbyteries and often had people in need living with him there.

When he preached, he would place his watch on the lectern and never exceed ten minutes – a time limit recently recommended for all priests by Pope Francis!

He would tell a story – a parable from everyday life – and reflect on it in the light of the Gospel. He always concluded on an uplifting note because he felt that most people had hard enough lives and came to Mass for encouragement.

Father Peter passed away in James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, on November 9.

His niece, Elaine, has received many cards of condolence, of which this, from a past parishioner, is typical: “He was greatly loved by people far and wide. His great sense of justice, incredible memory, sense of humour and his ability to welcome and include everyone, particularly the marginalised and suffering, made him unique.”

In his homily at Father Peter’s funeral, Father Tom O’Neill said: “He inspired so many young people to build the kingdom of God both in this world as well as in the next – a kingdom of justice and a kingdom of peace. “He was a man who was thirsty for that kingdom, and especially for all matters to do with justice, which has to be the foundation of true peace.

“Peter had compassion on the world, on the planet, on the whole human race.

“While he was in jail he spoke so highly of the prisoners there, how they looked after him while he was in prison, and of the love and the charity that was in them.

“He was a man who believed in the incarnation. There was a presence about him, something he had. And he had the something all of us have. He had the risen Christ going around in his flesh.”

https://www.indcatholicnews.com/news/51293

Assisted Killing/Suicide sanctioned by Parliament

Background

Second reading passed

Kim Leadbeater’s Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill passed second reading on 29 November 2024 by 330–275.  A majority of 55.

The bill has been committed to a public bill committee – a group of MPs, yet to be selected, who will go through the bill line-by-line, scrutinising each clause and proposing amendments.

It is likely that consideration of the bill will continue into Spring 2025. The earliest possible date for report stage is Friday 25 April and so there is little incentive for the committee to complete before then.

Letter to the Tablet

1 December 2024

Dear Editor,

In the wake of the vote in favour of assisted killing our hearts are broken.

Made in an abbreviated time frame without careful preparation or long-term scrutiny, it shocks those who hold the belief that we live in a Christian country.

When we abandon our sense of God as creator we accept abortion as a ‘right.’

Now, incomprehensibly, from birth to assisted killing, the circle is completed.

In 1981 I heard a talk given by Saint Mother Teresa. Prophetically she said ‘When a mother can kill her child in the womb, all that remains is for us to kill ourselves’.

On Friday we arrived there and the darkness enfolds us with unimaginable consequences.

Carmel Martin

(Unpublished.  See also her article in 1986 in the Catholic Herald.) 

Reflection on Fr David Standley

By Eamon Duffy

25 April 2024, Memorial Mass at St. George’s Cathedral, Southwark

FR DAVID STANDLEY, who died aged 88 in St Peter’s Residence in Vauxhall, London on 21 March, never held high office in the Church but was one of the finest and most inspiring priests of his generation. Educated at Wimbledon College and Downing College Cambridge, where he read law, he was trained and ordained at the Venerabile in Rome, and returned to England in 1968, working first as chaplain to Guy’s Hospital, and from 1970 as assistant to Richard Incledon at Fisher House, the Cambridge University Catholic chaplaincy.

The honeymoon years after the Second Vatican Council were a time of religious ferment, hope and experiment, and they shaped Standley’s tastes and priestly style. He would always prefer ceramic cups to jewelled chalices, tie-dye fabric and unbleached linen to brocade and starched solemnity. It was no surprise when he developed an enthusiasm for circle dancing, or that, when he became involved with l’Arche, one resident would appositely christen him “David Sandals”.

Temperamentally cautious and judicious, he was a man who weighed ideas carefully, who pondered: friends joked that he saw 27 sides to every question. But under the measured caution was a resolute obedience to what he discerned as the demands of the Gospel. In the last terrifying years of the Cold War he was stirred by the example of the Jesuit anti-war activist Daniel Berrigan, and by Berrigan’s inspiration, Dorothy Day: that led in the 1980s to his involvement in Catholic Peace Action, and, despite the disapproval of his archbishop, Michael Bowen, in the antinuclear demonstrations organised by Pax Christi. He was arrested on Ash Wednesday 1988, after daubing the walls of the Ministry of Defence with a cross of ashes.

Characteristically, before that arrest, he preached a sermon gently explaining to his far-from-radical Bexley Heath parishioners why, precisely as a priest, he felt driven to non-violent but unlawful protest. His six-year posting to the Isle of Sheppey from 1991 was seen by some as punitive exile but he embraced the opportunity to immerse himself in ministry in the three prisons in his parish: prison ministry would remain a commitment, even in retirement.

In 1976, while chaplain at Kent University, David first became involved with l’Arche, in whose houses people with and without learning difficulties live together on terms of equality. For the rest of his life the spontaneity and mutual support of l’Arche expressed for him the spirit of the gospels. He went to see for himself l’Arche’s work in India in 1979, and when he left Kent in 1984, he took a sabbatical to live and work as an assistant in one of the homes of l’Arche London.

Perhaps in contrast to his own tendency to overthink things, he relished the unexpectedness and fun he found in l’Arche, like the resident with cerebral palsy who livened an Ash Wednesday liturgy by carefully ashing David, the celebrant, in a long black streak down the full length of his nose. He treasured, while puzzling over, the judgement of one l’Arche resident that “I like David, I do, he’s handicapped on both sides”. One of the last events he attended was a l’Arche celebration of his 88th birthday, when, microphone in hand, he led the exuberant singing of “Soon, and very soon, we are going to see the king”.

L’Arche has been described as a school of attentive presence to other people, and for David that was the key to priesthood. Advising another priest who was new to l’Arche he told him: “Focus on what you receive, don’t try to control.” He recoiled from any association of priesthood with power or status, disliked concelebration, and avoided the annual chrism masses, because serried ranks of vested priests would process into the cathedral in what he thought was a glaring icon of male exclusivity. In each of his parishes he facilitated lay involvement, initiative and leadership. He was a remarkable confessor – wise, compassionate, non-coercive – and he was a committed ecumenist, keen to befriend and cooperate with colleagues from other Churches, respectful and appreciative of their ministries.

DAVID NEVER found celibacy easy, and believed strongly that priests should be allowed to marry. Women friends were important to him, and there were times when the strains imposed on both parties by such friendship made him question his vocation. Yet it seemed to friends that celibacy intensified his remarkable sensitivity to other people and gave him a depth and edge that he might have lacked in a more conventionally contented existence. He once said that when he presided at Mass, pronouncing the words “This is my body … given up for you” carried a very personal resonance. Above everything else, David was a priest for other people. He kept all the Christmas cards he received in a box by his bed through the year. Each night he would take the top card from the pile and spend a while thinking and praying about the sender: then he put the card back at the bottom of the pile. The same care went into the often whimsical individualised greetings cards that he crafted for friends by cutting pictures out of papers and magazines, pasting them carefully to cards trimmed exactly to size, with an appropriate personal inscription.

Retirement in 2011 from Battersea, his last parish, gave him more time for l’Arche, and to share with friends the love of music, art and books that fed the sense of reverence and wonder underlying his gentle and humane ministry. But although no longer in harness, his priesthood remained central. In lockdown he began weekly zoomed Masses, which continued on a weekday evening after lockdown ended and remained hugely important for the very diverse circle of those who shared them. He was always a man of prayer, nourished by his friendship with the Benedictine nuns of Minster, where he led annual retreats for people with learning difficulties, and his long involvement in the Jesus Caritas fraternity of priests.

IN 2018 he was diagnosed with bowel cancer, a condition whose indignities he bore with wry humour, and he used the subsequent years of remission to good effect, organising a book club, taking friends and l’Arche assistants to exhibitions and concerts; fascinated by the 2023 Marina Abramovic retrospective at the Royal Academy, he made repeated visits, and was memorably photographed passing through its mysterious illuminated portal.

Though his illness progressed more rapidly than he had hoped after his move to St Peter’s, he embraced the process without fear, even with curiosity: to one visitor he said: “I wonder what God is saying to me through this cancer: I wouldn’t want to miss it,” and he often recalled a story about a man at a talk of Dan Berrigan’s who’d said: “I’m dying”, to which Berrigan replied: “How exciting!” David said he didn’t find talk about heaven helpful – it seemed insufficiently centred on God and Christ, too knowledgeable about what can’t be known. He now found that prayer, and faith, though no easier, had become simpler. He’d stopped worrying, he said, about the big questions, increasingly resting in the one conviction that love was the heart of the mystery of God, and of our human existence. Love was in charge, so all would be well. He was much taken with a phrase from a poem by D.H. Lawrence, “dipped in God, and newcreated”: it’s what he hoped awaited us all.

Friends streamed to see him in his last weeks in St Peter’s: there, in his patient acceptance of his growing weakness, his tranquil trust in God’s love, in his affection for those who cared for or came to see him, in his desire to live every stage of what he called “the last stretch home”, he gave us the final gift of his priesthood. He showed us how to die.

Eamon Duffy is emeritus professor of the history of Christianity at the University of Cambridge and a Fellow and former president of Magdalene College.

Published in the Tablet, 25 April 2024

Eulogy for Fr David

By Roger Hearing

To most of you here today, David was FATHER. To us, his family, of course, father is the one thing David wasn’t. A much-loved brother, son, uncle, a great-uncle too – the person whose choice of birthday card or Christmas present could be counted on to surprise; the card, or, often, the postcard coming with an observation, or a question – David was always keen to challenge, in the kindest way possible, our too-comfortable thoughts.

It’s hard to sum up a life so various, so full, but in the same way a family photo album holds instances, images, moments by which we remember a person, I’d like to pull out a few of our moments.

The four-year-old in wartime Worcester Park who’d done his first day at school, having to be dragged bodily back on day two – he had BEEN to school, he protested. He’d done all the learning that was necessary.

The stubborn lad who would take some pleasure insisting, to his older sister’s fury, that the weapon deployed against German bombers was an AUNTY aircraft gun

Much later – the lithe young, unreasonably cool Cambridge chaplain, enjoying a late sixties summer-of-love punting party on the river, falling in… and being unnecessarily rescued by… just about everyone.

The running, dodging protest priest determined to make it across the narrow lawn surrounding the Ministry of Defence to scrawl a cross on its concrete walls and make a point about nuclear weapons, as well as striving not to injure the policeman who rather gently rugby tackled him

The semi-retired gentleman who, confronted by the huge spiral slide at Tate Modern, decided it was not just for children, and came whizzing down, with a broad smile and a sense of perverse achievement

David could find the joy in almost anything. What echoes to me is his phrase – hands open and wide, when something really pleased him and fitted his ideal of the simple and the good –  “Lovely, lovely” I hope, I suspect – somewhere he is saying that now.

Marking the MoD 13 March 2024

Today, Ray Towey marked the Ministry of Defence, UK, as a witness against the nuclear war preparations of this Government.

See pictures below.

Ray was supported by Carmel and Dan Martin. 

As usual, we started in the nearby park with prayers and readings from the Bible and ‘Follow Me – The Way of the Cross’, with reflections taken from the writings of Blessed Franz Jagerstatter (pub Pax Chrisiti).   Prepared and led by Carmel, see below.

The Police arrived after Ray had written several messages under the MoD plaque. 

“The Cross

“Trident is Genocide

“Choose Life not terror”

He was stopped, arrested and then de-arrested.  He was required to provide information, told not to return to the MoD, and sent on his way.  ‘Go away and come back to write another day,’ one of the Officers said.

We give thanks to God for another witness for peace in this time of war, and threats of, and preparations for, nuclear war.  We have engaged in this Lenten witness almost every year since 7 March 1984.

Catholic Peace Action

Ray Towey
Carmel and Dan Martin

https://catholicpeaceaction.org/

Prayers for Ray’s Witness

Luke 23:23-25

‘The people kept on shouting loudly for Jesus to be put to death. Finally Pilate gave in. He released the man who was in prison for rioting and murder, because he was the one the crowd wanted to have set free. Then Pilate handed Jesus over for them to do what they wanted with him’

Luke 23:23-25

Lord Hear us

We recall the words of our brother Blessed Franz Jägerstätter:

‘Even if I write these words with my hands in chains, I still find that much better than if my will were in chains. Neither prison, nor chains, nor sentence of death can rob a person of his faith and his free will.’

Today we ask God’s blessings on Ray as he places a sign of the cross on The Ministry of Defence building.  United in the suffering of Jesus’ way of the cross and death, and Franz’ ultimate sacrifice to death may this witness today pierce through the darkness of death and destruction that overshadows us through the Nuclear War preparations orchestrated within the Ministry Of Defence Building. May the light, hope and miracle of the resurrection be realised through this witness.

Amen

Our Father

Hail Mary

“Lord Jesus, increase our love for you and unite our hearts and will with yours, that we may only seek and desire what is pleasing to you.”

The Immorality of Nuclear Weapons

ADDRESS OF HIS HOLINESS POPE FRANCIS

TO MEMBERS OF THE DIPLOMATIC CORPS ACCREDITED TO THE HOLY SEE

Benediction Hall

Monday, 8 January 2024

Wars, nonetheless, are able to continue thanks to the enormous stock of available weapons.

There is need to pursue a policy of disarmament, since it is illusory to think that weapons have deterrent value. The contrary is true: the availability of weapons encourages their use and increases their production. Weapons create mistrust and divert resources. How many lives could be saved with the resources that today are misdirected to weaponry? Would it not be better to invest those resources in the pursuit of genuine global security? The challenges of our time transcend borders, as we see from the variety of crises – of food, the environment, the economy and health care – that have marked the beginning of the century. Here I reiterate my proposal that a global fund be established to finally eliminate hunger [4] and to promote a sustainable development of the entire planet.

Among the threats caused by these instruments of death, I cannot fail to mention those produced by nuclear arsenals and the development of increasingly sophisticated and destructive weapons. Here, I once more affirm the immorality of manufacturing and possessing nuclear weapons.

[For the complete address go to this link: https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2024/january/documents/20240108-corpo-diplomatico.html ]

Africa

This exchange between Ray Towey and (Prof) Tina Beattie began on 07 December 2023, in The TABLET, a Catholic publication in London.

Topic of the week – the scourge the Church ignores


Professor Vimal Tirimanna (Letters, 2 December) makes the debatable claim that some topics omitted from the Synod report (LGBTQ, women’s ordination, priestly celibacy) are “hot-button issues” from the “developed world”. This cannot go unchallenged. In Uganda, gays and lesbians face the death penalty. Priestly celibacy is so alien to most African cultures that it has to be asked how often it is observed. Stories abound of priests with children, and of African and Asian priests sexually abusing religious sisters.

There is strong support for women’s ordination across many countries in Latin America and elsewhere. But the elephant in the room remains the total silence on women’s reproductive health. Nearly 300,000 of the world’s poorest women and girls die every year in causes relating to pregnancy and childbirth, and thousands more suffer debilitating fistulas and other injuries. The vast majority of these are in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. This is indeed a hot-button issue. Why, when the Synod involved so many women participants and so many bishops from the Global South, does this scourge on the lives of poor women remain unacknowledged and unaddressed? One can search church teaching documents in vain for any mention of the suffering caused to individuals, families and communities by maternal mortality, which is one of the most avoidable causes of death. It is vanishingly rare in countries with good obstetric care, though rates are rising in the UK and are shamefully high in the US.

As long as the Church’s teaching ignores this reality with its glossy romanticism about maternal life and its eloquent but selective rhetoric about poverty, it cannot claim to be a poor Church of the poor. Why don’t the African and Asian bishops speak up? Did any of the women at the Synod raise these issues? And given the much-vaunted inclusivity of the synodal process, is it not right that we, the laity, should be able to ask such questions of those who were there, and expect honest answers?

(Prof) Tina Beattie Rye,

East Sussex.

Catholic Heroism

I read with dismay Prof Tina Beattie’s letter (9 December) accusing the Catholic Church of ignoring the plight of health care for the poorest women in Africa.

Over the last 40 years I have travelled extensively as an academic and as a lay missionary and worked with the Catholic Church in some of the remotest parts of sub-Saharan Africa, and I can assure her and your readers that you will find entire religious orders of nuns and priests and brothers who have given their entire lives to the care of the poorest women in the world.

It has been my privilege to work alongside these heroic individuals who at significant personal cost show a living witness to the Church’s special option for the poor. You will see the Catholic Church at its most inspiring. The faithful in Africa remain a significant pro-life community in every meaning of the word because of the service of these generations of missionaries. 

(Dr) Raymond Towey London SE5.

Church in Africa

Dr Raymond Towey (Letters, 16 December) read my letter (9 December) as an accusation that the Catholic Church ignores maternal mortality and other obstetric risks among the poorest women in Africa, so I’d like to clarify. My letter referred to the silence of the Church’s leaders and official teaching documents on these issues, including the Synod report. It did not refer to the Church at the grassroots.

I’ve lived in sub-Saharan Africa for much of my life. I know that Catholic religious orders work tirelessly to provide education and healthcare for poor women and girls, including care during pregnancy and childbirth, and for thousands of young women suffering from life-threatening infections and injuries after abortions. Dr Towey’s claim that “the faithful in Africa remain a significant pro-life community” risks glossing a more complex and often tragic reality, but I suspect we are on the same side.

(Prof.) Tina Beattie

Rye, East Sussex

2023

28 February 2023

In our traditional non-violent way, Catholic Peace Action returned to mark the MoD and call the Nation to forsake the use of nuclear weapons.

Ray Towey marked the Building but was not arrested. He received a caution and warned not to return to the MoD. We wait to see if the charge of criminal damage will follow. During the witness we had a good dialogue with the Police.

We three gathered at noon in the park adjacent to the main entrance to the ministry of Defence. It was a cold day but Dan’s heartfelt prayer warmed our spirits.

‘Oh Lord, bless us this day as we prepare to resist the Nuclear War preparations undertaken by our Government. We pray for those who make these decisions and for those who work in the building. Bless us, our families and friends; our homes and country. Bless Ray as he undertakes this action of Civil Disobedience. We pray for an end to war and nuclear war preparations.’

Ray is being cautioned by a MoD police officer.

What the Catholic Church Teaches on Nuclear Weapons

Pope Francis, Hiroshima 2019

Catholic Peace Action since 1982 has advocated civil disobedience against nuclear weapons, encouraged others to do so and by its very name claimed this to be a consistent and defendable position as Catholics in good standing in a nuclear weapons state. It is probably therefore appropriate at some stage to take an overview of what the Catholic Church officially teaches regarding nuclear weapons. For Catholics the foundation of their faith is in the bible and in the teaching of the Church through its centuries of history. Personal conscience is also very important in individual decision making for Catholics but the Church teaches that personal conscience must be informed and rooted in the bible and in the official teaching of the Church.

The word atomic weapon can be found in the current Catechism of the Catholic Church and the relevant paragraph is 2314 and its support is reference 109, Gaudium et Spes a document of Vatican II 1965. All these documents can be freely downloaded from the internet.

“Every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and man, which merits firm and unequivocal condemnation.”(109 Gaudium et Spes)

“A danger of modern warfare is that it provides the opportunity to those who possess modern scientific weapons especially atomic, biological, or chemical weapons – to commit such crimes.

The Catholic Church has always been consistent that there can be no moral case for the actual use of a weapon of mass destruction as it is indiscriminate. On this basis the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Catholic teaching are indefensible.

These writings however did not close the discussion as it was argued by many leading Catholics that the concept of nuclear deterrence would not only prevent the use of nuclear weapons but even prevent war itself. A balance of terror they argued would at the height of the Cold War preserve peace if both sides had nuclear arsenals. Pope St.John Paul II gave some support for this position when he wrote in 1982 to the United Nations,

“in current conditions deterrence based on balance, certainly not as an end in itself but as a step on the way toward a progressive disarmament, may still be judged morally acceptable.”

For Catholics in a nuclear weapons state this was a very interesting time with debate for and against the possession of nuclear weapons. These debates and exchanges continued for many years with respect shown on all sides.

The Scottish Catholic Bishops in 1982 also made a statement,

“If it is immoral to use these (nuclear) weapons it is immoral to threaten their use”

For many years the official position of the Catholic Church remained that of Pope St.John Paul II but the discussions continued and as time progressed the conditional acceptance of nuclear deterrence became more difficult to sustain as it became more evident the condition of progressive disarmament was not happening.

In 2005 Archbishop Migliore, the then observer of the Holy See to the United Nations wrote,

“The time has gone for finding ways to a balance in terror, the time has come to re-examine the whole strategy of nuclear deterrence…it is evident that nuclear deterrence drives the development of ever newer nuclear arms thus preventing genuine nuclear disarmament.”

In 2006 Pope Benedict XVI in his address on World Peace Day said,

“What can be said, too, about those governments which count on nuclear arms as a means of ensuring the security of their countries? Along with countless persons of good will, one can state that this point of view is not only baneful but also completely fallacious”

In 2011 Archbishop Francis Chullikatt the then current Holy See’s observer at the United Nations reviewed the Church’s teaching at a meeting in the USA commenting and quoting from Church teaching,

“Today, more and more people are convinced that nuclear deterrence is not a viable means of providing security. If some nations can continue to claim the right to possess nuclear weapons, then other states will claim that right as well. There can be no privileged position whereby some states can rely on nuclear weapons while simultaneously denying that same right to other states. Such an unbalanced position is unsustainable.”

“The Holy See has never countenanced nuclear deterrence as a permanent measure, nor does it today when it is evident that nuclear deterrence drives the development of ever newer nuclear arms, thus preventing genuine nuclear disarmament.

“Maintaining nuclear deterrence into the 21st century will not aid but impede peace. Nuclear deterrence prevents genuine nuclear disarmament. It maintains an unacceptable hegemony over non-nuclear development for the poorest half of the world’s population. It is a fundamental obstacle to achieving a new age of global security.

“Nuclear weapons, aptly described as the ‘ultimate evil’, are still possessed by the most powerful States which refuse to let them go…….. No weapon so threatens the longed-for peace of the 21st century as the nuclear.”

Pope Francis was elected in 2013 and he has addressed the issue of nuclear weapons. In 2019 in Hiroshima he said:

“The use of atomic energy for purposes of war is immoral, just as the possessing of nuclear weapons is immoral.”

During an inflight press conference aboard the plane bringing back Pope Francis from Japan in 2019 he is reported to have said,

“The use of nuclear weapons is immoral which is why it must be added to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Not only their use but also possessing them: because an accident or the madness of some government leader, one person’s madness can destroy humanity.

It is clear that the Catholic Church’s official teaching on nuclear weapons has moved on from 1982.

Ray Towey