Tag Archives: Ray Towey

Newsletter May 2025

Dear Friends

Important date: 23 June

As you know, Ray was in court on 22 April.  The conversation with the Judge clarified a few things.

The Crown Prosecution Service wants to proceed and Ray is charged with Criminal Damage (ref Criminal Damage Act 1971).

He is required to appear on 23 June 2025 at Westminster Magistrates Court, 181 Marylebone Road, London NW1. 

The trial begins at 10 a.m. courtroom 9 and is given two hours to complete.

“My defence will be that I acted out of “necessity” to prevent a serious evil, nuclear war, which is a real possibility in our continued commitment to the nuclear weapon system of Trident.  The Trident program is a planned crime against humanity as can be understood from Natural Law, Reason, military ethics, medical and public health principles and Christian morality.“

Do come along if you can and/or send a letter of support.

From our last mailing we received many letters of support, which are helpful.  We share three with you below.

With all God’s blessings and peace

Catholic Peace Action

Ray, Carmel and Dan

—————————————————

Letters

Thank you very much for sending this amazing picture of the courageous Ray standing up for peace. It was most inspiring. I hope that he gets a great deal of support. I hope he doesn’t suffer too much in prison, but having lived in Africa he has probably done much suffering there and is probably able to sustain it. Certainly he needs our prayers, not only for himself but even more for his cause. Please be assured of our prayers.
May Our Blessed Mother Queen of Peace pour out abundant blessings on Ray, his family and friends at this time.

Lots of love and prayers from Sr Clara Retired Franciscan missionary

Dear Friends,

Thank you for this – and thank you, Ray, for your witness. We have become so blasé about nuclear weapons, our own, those probably now stored at Lakenheath by the Americans, Putin’s sabre-rattling references to his own…

Thank you for refusing to accept the unacceptable.

Rob

Fr Rob Esdaile 

Excellent work Ray! Still standing up for the truth which most do not want to know. 

Roger Ruston

———————————————————————————————–

Speaking up for Life at the end of Life

By Ray Towey

My MP, Helen Hayes asked me to attend a meeting on 26 November 2024.  She wanted me to comment on the ‘The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill Kim Leadbeater.  When it came to the vote, three days later, she voted against the Bill.  This is my input:

“My name is Raymond Towey and I qualified in medicine in 1967, I have been a medical doctor for 57 years. I am a specialist in anaesthesia and did much of my post graduate training in St. Thomas’ Hospital just a few hundred yards across the river.  I was appointed a consultant in anaesthesia to Guy’s Hospital in 1983. I am a Fellow of the Royal College of Anaesthetists.  In 1995 after about 10 years in Guy’s Hospital I resigned to work in East Africa as a volunteer doctor and I currently have a license to practice medicine in Uganda.  I do not practice in UK.

I am asking you to oppose this end of life bill for these reasons:

A flourishing and virtuous life is lived in a society with an ethical structure that promotes and encourages these principles. This bill will destroy these principles.

Let me quote from the Hippocratic oath formulated some 400 years before the birth of Christ:

  • For the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice.
  • I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.

This is the best the ancient Greek physicians and philosophers could formulate as the principle of medicine some 2,400 years ago. We dismantle these principles at our peril.

If the problem is the pain, do your best to eliminate the pain not the patient.

I don’t think it was an accident that anaesthesia, giving us painless surgery, was discovered in the 19th century in a society that strove to abide by these principles.

I don’t think it was an accident that the concept of “hospital care” was developed in Western Europe, which adhered to these principles for centuries and has been copied throughout the world.

I don’t think it was an accident that Dr. Cicely Saunders the founder of “hospice care” started her movement in a society that lived by these principles.“

 Ray also attended a protest of the Assisted Killing bill.

At a protest of the Bill on 30 November 2024, Ray is quoted as saying:

“Physician Dr Ray Towey told ICN: ” I’ve been a doctor for 50 years. I can’t believe it’s come to this. On the one hand people are selling second hand clothes and holding raffles to fund hospices. Then the government comes forward with a proposal to simply kill very frail or sick patients.  The Hippocratic Oath, which was drawn up 400 years before the birth of Christ, formulated an ethical structure for doctors never to harm patients. This has underpinned our work for more than 2,400 years. This bill just throws that out!”  (https://www.indcatholicnews.com/news/51206)

Dr Ray Towey and campaigners Image ICN/JS

(The Bill received its Second Reading on 29 November 2024. After five hours of debate, a majority of MPs voted for the Bill to progress to Committee Stage, with 330 MPs voting in favour and 275 voting against.  The Bill is now due to have its report stage and third reading on Friday 16 May. Amendments can be made to the Bill at Report Stage.  Amendments to be considered are selected by the Speaker.)

See also Carmel’s letter here

https://catholicpeaceaction.org/assisted-killing-suicide-sanctioned-by-parliament/

Dan and Carmel at a protest in April 2024

Lenten Resistance at the Ministry of Defence

April 2nd 2025

Dear Friend

Here is what we have been up to this Lent!

After moments of prayer and reflection, under the beautiful, sparkling blue spring sky, Ray, Dan and Carmel approached the front entrance of the Ministry of Defence.

It was unguarded, with only a trickle of workers entering and leaving. Ray climbed the steps and onto the plinth under the sign labelling the building.

He wrote everything he had planned to write in charcoal under the mark of a cross. ‘Trident is genocide, choose life not terror’.

He stood with his arms out and palms open indicating his non-violence and waited.

Three bemused young men stopped and one asked to take a picture with Ray for the project he was working on.  Ray told this man to not climb the steps as it would put him at risk of arrest.

After a few minutes a group of three heavily armed MoD police officers swiftly approached. ‘Good afternoon Mr Towey!’ called the lady officer whom we have encountered on previous days of marking the building. 

‘Good afternoon Mr Towey!’
called the lady MoD police officer.

More MoD officers arrived and we waited to see the outcome.

Another man stopped and asked what was happening. He was Russian from Moscow.  Dan asked him what would happen if a similar protest were to take place in Russia.  ‘We know what would happen – one can only imagine,’ he said: governments are the problem it isn’t the people.  Dan noted that Putin seems to regularly talk about using nuclear weapons; He replied: but we have to, in order to defend ourselves!  And then off he went.

Ray was thoroughly searched and relieved of his possessions.

He was cautioned and arrested for criminal damage. Over the past several years he was either not arrested or arrested and then de-arrested for doing this witness. It leaves us to wonder what the change in policy is and why now.

There was a time of waiting for the transport to arrive to convey Ray to Charing Cross Police Station, a short walk away. Ray offered to walk but that was against regulations! (As was explained to Dan several years ago: To protect the dignity of the prisoner.)

After some time of waiting in the cold wind that is always present in front of that building, the van arrived and three new officers locked Ray into the safety of the armoured vehicle.

At the police station Ray was finger printed, photographed, DNA tested and his phone examined, and was then locked in a cell for some hours.  He was offered food and drink frequently and after about 5 hours was given a formal and recorded interview by one Met officer.  The MoD police did not interview him.  He stated that he did not deny the marking of the wall but that it was a Christian witness against nuclear weapons using the Catholic Church’s symbols relating to the season of Lent.  (The ashes used during Ash Wednesday Services replaced by charcoal.)  The interviewing police officer was keen to release Ray if he would agree to a position relating to his contrition for the action and guilt.  Ray refused to sign any document and said that his defence was the charcoal could never have caused any criminal damage and that he had legal excuse to do the marking of the wall because of the criminality of nuclear weapons and that as a Christian it was his mission to make public opposition to this prepared crime of genocide.  

The interview lasted about 30 minutes and was courteous on both sides.  Ray was then returned to the cells.  After another two hours Ray was given a letter to attend the Court for bail conditions to be imposed.  The Met police were keen that he would promise to attend the court as requested on 22 April and Ray promised to do so.  The police officers were curious to find an elderly doctor in their custody and it gave Ray some minutes to explain what his motives were.  One exchange after the legal formalities had concluded included if he worked with Medecins Sans Frontieres in Africa and he replied, no he doesn’t do abortions. (MSF requires their staff to do abortions.)  He was pleased to be given this time to explain his motives; the police and surrounding people in the police station appeared to listen respectfully.

So after 7 hours in the Station, Ray refused to sign anything but did verbally promise to not return to the scene of the crime and mark the MoD again at that time and to attend Westminster Magistrate’s court (181 Marylebone Road) on 22 April at 2 pm.  We note that the ‘MG4A Bail to Court – Post Charge’ sheet does not mention a charge.  So it looks like we will find that out on the 22nd.  However at the time of the arrest Ray was cautioned and told he was being arrested for Criminal Damage.  But it is possible that the CPS will not press charges. 

If you are free please come to support Ray on 22 April.  Or send a message of support to him, either privately or marked for publication.

In God’s blessings and peace,

Ray Towey
Carmel and Dan Martin
CPA.at.MOD@gmail.com
https://catholicpeaceaction.org

Marking the MoD 13 March 2024

Today, Ray Towey marked the Ministry of Defence, UK, as a witness against the nuclear war preparations of this Government.

See pictures below.

Ray was supported by Carmel and Dan Martin. 

As usual, we started in the nearby park with prayers and readings from the Bible and ‘Follow Me – The Way of the Cross’, with reflections taken from the writings of Blessed Franz Jagerstatter (pub Pax Chrisiti).   Prepared and led by Carmel, see below.

The Police arrived after Ray had written several messages under the MoD plaque. 

“The Cross

“Trident is Genocide

“Choose Life not terror”

He was stopped, arrested and then de-arrested.  He was required to provide information, told not to return to the MoD, and sent on his way.  ‘Go away and come back to write another day,’ one of the Officers said.

We give thanks to God for another witness for peace in this time of war, and threats of, and preparations for, nuclear war.  We have engaged in this Lenten witness almost every year since 7 March 1984.

Catholic Peace Action

Ray Towey
Carmel and Dan Martin

https://catholicpeaceaction.org/

Prayers for Ray’s Witness

Luke 23:23-25

‘The people kept on shouting loudly for Jesus to be put to death. Finally Pilate gave in. He released the man who was in prison for rioting and murder, because he was the one the crowd wanted to have set free. Then Pilate handed Jesus over for them to do what they wanted with him’

Luke 23:23-25

Lord Hear us

We recall the words of our brother Blessed Franz Jägerstätter:

‘Even if I write these words with my hands in chains, I still find that much better than if my will were in chains. Neither prison, nor chains, nor sentence of death can rob a person of his faith and his free will.’

Today we ask God’s blessings on Ray as he places a sign of the cross on The Ministry of Defence building.  United in the suffering of Jesus’ way of the cross and death, and Franz’ ultimate sacrifice to death may this witness today pierce through the darkness of death and destruction that overshadows us through the Nuclear War preparations orchestrated within the Ministry Of Defence Building. May the light, hope and miracle of the resurrection be realised through this witness.

Amen

Our Father

Hail Mary

“Lord Jesus, increase our love for you and unite our hearts and will with yours, that we may only seek and desire what is pleasing to you.”

Africa

This exchange between Ray Towey and (Prof) Tina Beattie began on 07 December 2023, in The TABLET, a Catholic publication in London.

Topic of the week – the scourge the Church ignores


Professor Vimal Tirimanna (Letters, 2 December) makes the debatable claim that some topics omitted from the Synod report (LGBTQ, women’s ordination, priestly celibacy) are “hot-button issues” from the “developed world”. This cannot go unchallenged. In Uganda, gays and lesbians face the death penalty. Priestly celibacy is so alien to most African cultures that it has to be asked how often it is observed. Stories abound of priests with children, and of African and Asian priests sexually abusing religious sisters.

There is strong support for women’s ordination across many countries in Latin America and elsewhere. But the elephant in the room remains the total silence on women’s reproductive health. Nearly 300,000 of the world’s poorest women and girls die every year in causes relating to pregnancy and childbirth, and thousands more suffer debilitating fistulas and other injuries. The vast majority of these are in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. This is indeed a hot-button issue. Why, when the Synod involved so many women participants and so many bishops from the Global South, does this scourge on the lives of poor women remain unacknowledged and unaddressed? One can search church teaching documents in vain for any mention of the suffering caused to individuals, families and communities by maternal mortality, which is one of the most avoidable causes of death. It is vanishingly rare in countries with good obstetric care, though rates are rising in the UK and are shamefully high in the US.

As long as the Church’s teaching ignores this reality with its glossy romanticism about maternal life and its eloquent but selective rhetoric about poverty, it cannot claim to be a poor Church of the poor. Why don’t the African and Asian bishops speak up? Did any of the women at the Synod raise these issues? And given the much-vaunted inclusivity of the synodal process, is it not right that we, the laity, should be able to ask such questions of those who were there, and expect honest answers?

(Prof) Tina Beattie Rye,

East Sussex.

Catholic Heroism

I read with dismay Prof Tina Beattie’s letter (9 December) accusing the Catholic Church of ignoring the plight of health care for the poorest women in Africa.

Over the last 40 years I have travelled extensively as an academic and as a lay missionary and worked with the Catholic Church in some of the remotest parts of sub-Saharan Africa, and I can assure her and your readers that you will find entire religious orders of nuns and priests and brothers who have given their entire lives to the care of the poorest women in the world.

It has been my privilege to work alongside these heroic individuals who at significant personal cost show a living witness to the Church’s special option for the poor. You will see the Catholic Church at its most inspiring. The faithful in Africa remain a significant pro-life community in every meaning of the word because of the service of these generations of missionaries. 

(Dr) Raymond Towey London SE5.

Church in Africa

Dr Raymond Towey (Letters, 16 December) read my letter (9 December) as an accusation that the Catholic Church ignores maternal mortality and other obstetric risks among the poorest women in Africa, so I’d like to clarify. My letter referred to the silence of the Church’s leaders and official teaching documents on these issues, including the Synod report. It did not refer to the Church at the grassroots.

I’ve lived in sub-Saharan Africa for much of my life. I know that Catholic religious orders work tirelessly to provide education and healthcare for poor women and girls, including care during pregnancy and childbirth, and for thousands of young women suffering from life-threatening infections and injuries after abortions. Dr Towey’s claim that “the faithful in Africa remain a significant pro-life community” risks glossing a more complex and often tragic reality, but I suspect we are on the same side.

(Prof.) Tina Beattie

Rye, East Sussex

2023

28 February 2023

In our traditional non-violent way, Catholic Peace Action returned to mark the MoD and call the Nation to forsake the use of nuclear weapons.

Ray Towey marked the Building but was not arrested. He received a caution and warned not to return to the MoD. We wait to see if the charge of criminal damage will follow. During the witness we had a good dialogue with the Police.

We three gathered at noon in the park adjacent to the main entrance to the ministry of Defence. It was a cold day but Dan’s heartfelt prayer warmed our spirits.

‘Oh Lord, bless us this day as we prepare to resist the Nuclear War preparations undertaken by our Government. We pray for those who make these decisions and for those who work in the building. Bless us, our families and friends; our homes and country. Bless Ray as he undertakes this action of Civil Disobedience. We pray for an end to war and nuclear war preparations.’

Ray is being cautioned by a MoD police officer.

What the Catholic Church Teaches on Nuclear Weapons

Pope Francis, Hiroshima 2019

Catholic Peace Action since 1982 has advocated civil disobedience against nuclear weapons, encouraged others to do so and by its very name claimed this to be a consistent and defendable position as Catholics in good standing in a nuclear weapons state. It is probably therefore appropriate at some stage to take an overview of what the Catholic Church officially teaches regarding nuclear weapons. For Catholics the foundation of their faith is in the bible and in the teaching of the Church through its centuries of history. Personal conscience is also very important in individual decision making for Catholics but the Church teaches that personal conscience must be informed and rooted in the bible and in the official teaching of the Church.

The word atomic weapon can be found in the current Catechism of the Catholic Church and the relevant paragraph is 2314 and its support is reference 109, Gaudium et Spes a document of Vatican II 1965. All these documents can be freely downloaded from the internet.

“Every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and man, which merits firm and unequivocal condemnation.”(109 Gaudium et Spes)

“A danger of modern warfare is that it provides the opportunity to those who possess modern scientific weapons especially atomic, biological, or chemical weapons – to commit such crimes.

The Catholic Church has always been consistent that there can be no moral case for the actual use of a weapon of mass destruction as it is indiscriminate. On this basis the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Catholic teaching are indefensible.

These writings however did not close the discussion as it was argued by many leading Catholics that the concept of nuclear deterrence would not only prevent the use of nuclear weapons but even prevent war itself. A balance of terror they argued would at the height of the Cold War preserve peace if both sides had nuclear arsenals. Pope St.John Paul II gave some support for this position when he wrote in 1982 to the United Nations,

“in current conditions deterrence based on balance, certainly not as an end in itself but as a step on the way toward a progressive disarmament, may still be judged morally acceptable.”

For Catholics in a nuclear weapons state this was a very interesting time with debate for and against the possession of nuclear weapons. These debates and exchanges continued for many years with respect shown on all sides.

The Scottish Catholic Bishops in 1982 also made a statement,

“If it is immoral to use these (nuclear) weapons it is immoral to threaten their use”

For many years the official position of the Catholic Church remained that of Pope St.John Paul II but the discussions continued and as time progressed the conditional acceptance of nuclear deterrence became more difficult to sustain as it became more evident the condition of progressive disarmament was not happening.

In 2005 Archbishop Migliore, the then observer of the Holy See to the United Nations wrote,

“The time has gone for finding ways to a balance in terror, the time has come to re-examine the whole strategy of nuclear deterrence…it is evident that nuclear deterrence drives the development of ever newer nuclear arms thus preventing genuine nuclear disarmament.”

In 2006 Pope Benedict XVI in his address on World Peace Day said,

“What can be said, too, about those governments which count on nuclear arms as a means of ensuring the security of their countries? Along with countless persons of good will, one can state that this point of view is not only baneful but also completely fallacious”

In 2011 Archbishop Francis Chullikatt the then current Holy See’s observer at the United Nations reviewed the Church’s teaching at a meeting in the USA commenting and quoting from Church teaching,

“Today, more and more people are convinced that nuclear deterrence is not a viable means of providing security. If some nations can continue to claim the right to possess nuclear weapons, then other states will claim that right as well. There can be no privileged position whereby some states can rely on nuclear weapons while simultaneously denying that same right to other states. Such an unbalanced position is unsustainable.”

“The Holy See has never countenanced nuclear deterrence as a permanent measure, nor does it today when it is evident that nuclear deterrence drives the development of ever newer nuclear arms, thus preventing genuine nuclear disarmament.

“Maintaining nuclear deterrence into the 21st century will not aid but impede peace. Nuclear deterrence prevents genuine nuclear disarmament. It maintains an unacceptable hegemony over non-nuclear development for the poorest half of the world’s population. It is a fundamental obstacle to achieving a new age of global security.

“Nuclear weapons, aptly described as the ‘ultimate evil’, are still possessed by the most powerful States which refuse to let them go…….. No weapon so threatens the longed-for peace of the 21st century as the nuclear.”

Pope Francis was elected in 2013 and he has addressed the issue of nuclear weapons. In 2019 in Hiroshima he said:

“The use of atomic energy for purposes of war is immoral, just as the possessing of nuclear weapons is immoral.”

During an inflight press conference aboard the plane bringing back Pope Francis from Japan in 2019 he is reported to have said,

“The use of nuclear weapons is immoral which is why it must be added to the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Not only their use but also possessing them: because an accident or the madness of some government leader, one person’s madness can destroy humanity.

It is clear that the Catholic Church’s official teaching on nuclear weapons has moved on from 1982.

Ray Towey

Dorothy Day and Abortion

I feel that, as in the time of the Desert Fathers, the young are fleeing the cities–wandering over the face of the land, living after a fashion in voluntary poverty and manual labor, seeming to be inactive in the “peace movement.” I know they are still a part of it–just as Cesar Chavez and the Farm Workers’ Movement is also part of it, committed to non-violence, even while they resist, fighting for their lives and their families’ lives. (They, together with the blacks, feel and have stated this, that birth control and abortion are genocide.)

I agree with them and say–make room for children, don’t do away with them. Up and down and on both sides of the Hudson River religious orders own thousands of acres of land, cultivated, landscaped, but not growing food for the hungry or founding villages for the families or schools for the children.

Dorothy Day Open Letter to Fr.Dan Berrigan On Pilgrimage 1972

It’s not often mentioned and perhaps not widely known that before her conversion Dorothy Day, co-founder of the Catholic Worker Movement, had an abortion. In her novel The Eleventh Virgin she describes her character having an abortion and then being deserted by her partner afterwards. This was indeed Dorothy Day’s own personal experience when 22 years old. She doubted that she would ever get pregnant again and she refers to this fear in her book, The Long Loneliness. Pelvic sepsis following this illegal and possibly unsterile procedure was not unusual and the consequent Fallopian tube obstruction could result in sterility. She rarely wrote about abortion but was profoundly remorseful of her lifestyle before her conversion. In the Long Loneliness she describes how very blessed she felt when in 1925 she realised that she had become pregnant with her partner Forster Batterham. One can only surmise how her faith journey was influenced by the remorse of her earlier abortion and her bliss at becoming pregnant again. This time this new life would be welcomed and baptised into the Catholic Church even if she was to lose the man she deeply loved.

Some might say what right have I have to even raise the issue of abortion because I am a man. We are all touched by human life but as a medical doctor and specialist anaesthetist I was particularly involved as I was asked to anaesthetise for abortions several times in my career and refused. I always noticed who was Catholic in the anaesthetic department by seeing who were claiming their legal right under the 1967 Abortion Act to be conscientious objectors. One colleague even said that he wished that he was Catholic so that he could refuse despite the fact that the legal right to refuse also applies to any person on simply conscience grounds. In my personal experience I don’t recall any other person refusing who wasn’t a Catholic. I should always be grateful to Cardinal Heenan who obtained that legal concession in 1967. When I hear criticisms of the institutional Church I thank God how its intervention in 1967 protected both my mind and soul.

Lenten marking of the MoD, at the entrance opposite Downing Street.

There are probably two reasons why I could never have been a specialist in obstetrics and gynaecology. The first is that I don’t think I could have suffered well the severe sleep deprivation and secondly of how to negotiate the 1967 Abortion Act. As a young doctor with no friends in high places the last thing I needed was being a “troublesome” junior doctor with inconvenient scruples.

There are two Lenten witnesses I have tried do whenever possible in London. The first is the one that any follower of Dorothy Day would find not unusual. This is the marking of the Ministry of Defence building as a sign of Christian opposition to nuclear war preparations. Dorothy Day regularly did civil disobedience against the New York civil defence preparations for a potential nuclear attack. She viewed this as legitimising plans for nuclear war and opposed the nuclear arms race from 1945. As a consequence of this frequent witness she once spent time in jail. My second witness was praying at an abortion clinic which was usually until recently in Ealing London at the Marie Stopes clinic. Both require a commitment to non-violence.

Ealing, London, Marie Stopes abortion clinic

When planning to pray at Ealing I was pleased to be asked to not only sign an online promise of non-violence both verbal and physical before the witness at the abortion clinic but also asked to sign a hard copy when I arrived. The anti-abortionists prayed the Rosary which I joined and I saw no intimidation of the patients going into the clinic. Their focus on the Rosary meant that there was little eye contact with the pro-abortion demonstrators which removed any spirit of judgement and antagonism and their prayer was combined with practical support for those women who decide to change their decision. However since 2018 anyone praying at this abortion clinic now risks arrest as the local council have instituted what is a virtual no praying zone around this clinic.

Would Dorothy Day and Peter Maurin have approved of my witness for peace at the Ministry of Defence? Would they have approved my witness for life at the abortion clinic? Would they see the connection between the two at a time when over 180,000 abortions are carried out in UK each year and when Parliament voted against a ban on sex selective abortion in 2015? Can you make a call to choose life in one issue and ignore the other?

The first century Bethlehem massacre of the innocents was then a gender discrimination against the male child whereas the global gender select abortion is now a discrimination against the female child. Academics can estimate the missing women globally when the gender balance in society is measured. One academic has made an estimate of 100 million missing women globally, mainly in Asia.

Ray Towey

Court Report: Independent Catholic News September 2012

3 activists who took part in actions at MoD

The three offered clear and moving accounts of their peace actions at the Ministry of Defence during Holy Week 2012 when they marked the building with blessed charcoal using words such as ‘Trident Crucifies the Poor’ and ‘Disarm Trident’. Reports from arresting officers were read out in court which affirmed that there actions had been
totally nonviolent and that they had not resisted arrest in any way. While not disputing the fact of their action, they all argued that they had lawful excuse and moral convictions for what they did.

Twenty-five supporters joined Dr Ray Towey, 68, Henrietta Cullinan, 50, and Katrina Alton , 44, for a time of prayer outside Hammersmith Magistrates’ Court today before a three-hour hearing which found them guilty of causing criminal damage.

Ray, Henrietta and Katrina explained the relevance of the time and symbols used: Lent, a time for reflection and repentance at both personal and community levels and charcoal, a known symbol of that repentance that is used within the Christian faith community. The protection of life and people was at the heart of their actions and they all stated that these were more important than property or buildings. Their intention in marking the Ministry of Defence building was to engage the Ministry and those who work there in critical reflection on the UK’s nuclear defence policy and the Trident programme in particular in order to change it and prevent nuclear weapons from ever being used.

Judge Susan Williams acknowledged her understanding of this in her questioning of Ray Towey, and again in her summing up saying that these were profound means used to highlight the folly of humankind.

The three, who defended themselves, were given substantial time to present their own evidence and outline why they did what they did. The Judge said that she needed a good amount of time to reflect on what she had heard and the legal implications and adjourned the hearing for almost two hours.

Before adjournment, Ray Towey made a short intervention inviting the Judge to discharge them and to stand outside the normal boundaries of the legal institution and set a precedent. On her return she gave a fulsome summary – showing that she had listened with great care to all that she had heard – but ultimately finding them guilty of criminal damage. They were each charged with paying £200 court costs. While the Ministry of Defence had put forward a claim for £400 cleaning costs the Judge refused to enforce this.

The three were given an absolute discharge. All of them made it clear that they could not in conscience pay the court costs.

Their action was supported by the London Catholic Worker, Catholic Peace Action and Pax Christi.

For Ray Towey the outcome of this trial would be finalised on 24 June 2014 when he was called to attend Camberwell Magistrates Court to explain why he had not paid the court £200 costs. He had during this time several letters from bailiffs requesting the money and he had replied that as a Christian to him nuclear weapons were immoral and that he could not in conscience pay the court as he considered his actions in 2012 justified and therefore he was not guilty. Usually this defence is not accepted and a prison sentence of about 7 days would be expected. The judge listened to his explanation and replied that she would not accept this refusal but would give him more time to pay. He asked her not to delay her judgement as he was not going to pay and he wished to resolve the issue that day. She told him to go away and consider payment. He therefore left the court disappointed that the issue still remained unresolved. As he was descending the stairs leading to the exit the Clerk of the Court called out to him to return to the court as there was now a possibility of another outcome which might be beneficial to him. On return to the court the Judge sentence him to one day in jail. A one day sentence means that he was confined to the court till the end of business that day. It is in effect a symbolic sentence which meant he had no longer any need of paying the costs and would be free that day to go home. Ray Towey thanked her when the court rose and went home as a free person.

Homily for Franz Jagerstatter Memorial Service

This was delivered as the homily on 9 August 2018 in the Crypt Chapel of Westminster Cathedral London by Ray Towey for the Franz Jagerstatter Memorial Service arranged by Pax Christi


The story is simple, a peasant farmer in Austria is conscripted to fight for Hitler, refuses claiming being a Catholic and being a soldier in Hitler’s army is incompatible so they kill him to preserve military morale. In 1943 German military morale was in serious jeopardy. The battle of Stalingrad had been lost.

The German state needed men at the eastern front. Franz was isolated in the Church, in the village, in his country. To his knowledge then no-one had taken a stand like this. I use the word peasant farmer purposefully not so often used now about Franz, to us it has negative connotations but the Gospel writer is clear about what is a negative:

I thank you Father Lord of heaven and earth because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned and have revealed them to children. (Luke ch10: 21)

This Gospel passage is uneasy reading because ever since I entered formal education I have striven to be someone who is both wise and learned. To the Gospel writer that comfortable self-image or illusion was an obstacle that Franz did not have.

In 1982 I returned from 2 years in a mission hospital in Nigeria. The overwhelming experience of working as a doctor in Africa is watching helplessly the premature death of scores from diseases easily preventable by a little money or curable by modest means.

This remains the global injustice of our time, so the injustice of the Falklands invasion at that time was minor in comparison and I could see no need for further human sacrifice. There was enough premature death in the world, more than enough in Africa alone.

And so, the armada travelled to the South Atlantic to right the wrong bringing with it a military hospital well equipped and I thought why not just make a small detour and share a few drugs from the pharmacy, a few bottles from the blood bank, Nigeria is close by to the east. We won’t delay you long, but don’t forget Sierra Leone, Ghana, we have friends there too, and what harm if we do delay you long?

Even a child could see the need but the wise and learned had other plans.

There was worse to come. The cruise missiles in Greenham Common were an essential counter to the SS20s of the Soviets and the Pershing 2s in Europe would give us the superiority we needed to keep our Christian culture safe and the Church at the highest level then was ambiguous.

What was this doctrine of nuclear deterrence, a necessary modern moral relativism for the Church or a new heresy, is that too strong a word and who was for the burning? everyone? and so we asked, where do we stand and we made a stand and not like Franz, alone, but we were few. Like Dorothy Day we had the nerve to call ourselves Catholic and thereby Catholic Peace Action. We were non-violent but did not keep the law and counted jail time as a duty or was it a spiritual pride in the new indulgences? were we the orthodox or the heterodox? Time would tell.

We added our small voice to others in and out of the Church. We shared with a few of our own bishops but at the time like Franz were not affirmed and learnt how to be strangers in our communities, our Church and country which we loved. But let me not forget Bishop Gumbleton from Detroit and Pax Christi who wrote us a good character witness letter for our bad disobedient behaviour which we copied for the court, usually to no avail, so unlike Franz we were not alone but we were few.

Fr. Daniel Berrigan has a reflection on Franz written some years before Franz’s beatification:

“As for Franz he will not go away, he will not go away from the Church that sent him on his way alone.

His way, which should have been the way of the Church.

So he lingers half unwelcome……….”

After the war Franz’s name was added to the memorial in his parish cemetery of those who had died for Austria but it was secretly erased. For some in his village his name was most unwelcome.

In his own diocese of Linz 40 priests were sent to concentration camps and 11 died. In the Archdiocese of Vienna which was twice the size of Linz 9 priests were sent to concentration camps and 1 died. There was resistance in the Church to the Nazi regime but it was thin and patchy. One of his parish priests had been banned from the parish by the regime for delivering an anti-Nazi sermon and even he advised him accept the conscription, he saw his bishop who advised the same.

When the wise and learned advised him to fight for Hitler was he choosing the way of suicide? This was his terrible deep spiritual anguish.

When he was transferred to the Berlin prison he met with the prison chaplain who related to him the case of an Austrian priest Fr.Reinisch who had refused to take the oath to Hitler and was executed a year before. Fr.Reinisch had been conscripted to the medical corps but still refused the oath stating that he opposed the Nazi world view which had resulted in murder, the elimination of the mentally disabled, forced sterilisation, the illegal annexation of Austria. The chaplain relates that Franz breathed a sigh of relief and was greatly encouraged and said, “l can’t be on the wrong path after all, if even a priest has decided the same and has gone to his death for it then it’s all right for me to do it too.”

I think this was the first time he had heard of anyone refusing conscription for Christian reasons and it suggests that even at this late stage he was still in need of more support that his stand was correct and not a suicide.

After the war the search for justice began but there were to be dispensations, if you had the secrets of the VI and V2 rockets there was an amnesty. The learned and the wise needed you, and a new and comfortable life in the West or the East guaranteed. These wonderous Nazi indiscriminate weapons of terror had their uses. The VI became cruise missiles and the V2 ballistic missiles, just add a nuclear warhead when required.

And so… Coventry, Hamburg, Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki….we know who won the battles but who won the values?

In 1941 while doing his military service after his second call up Franz writes, “Ybbs is a beautiful town.. there’s quite a large mental asylum here, which used to be full of patients but now probably even the mad have become sane, because there are no longer very many of them in the asylum. My dear wife there must be some truth in what you told me once about what’s happening to these people.

Franz and Franziska Jagerstatter
Franz and Franziska Jagerstatter

In May 1943 Franziska writes to Franz of the sudden death of a disabled child who had been put in a home for the disabled. Hundreds of thousands of disabled children, psychiatric patients, mentally disabled adults, Downs syndrome children were killed during the war. Bishop von Galen of Munster was a vociferous opponent of this Action T4 euthanasia programme and was placed under virtual house arrest in 1941.

In Europe these days Downs syndrome is becoming a rarity. For them we have developed our own final solution.

And what of us? The state may not need us in uniform but it still needs our obedience or is it just our silence?

But now it will never be so hard because we have Franz. Thank you, Franz from the bottom of my heart for making my small journey clearer, less lonely, more loyal, more forgiving and with no place for bitterness.

Download this as a pdf